Val's Chronicles

Reader

Read the latest posts from Val's Chronicles.

from The Chronicles

Jodi sat at her desk, staring at the blank email draft for what felt like hours. The cursor blinked rhythmically, almost mockingly, as she struggled to find the right words. After her last family gathering, she couldn't ignore it anymore – the subtle ways her sister Megan still treated her identity as optional, something to be acknowledged only when convenient.

The final straw had been overhearing Megan on the phone with their father, casually referring to Jodi by her deadname. The sound of it had stopped her cold in the hallway, a name she'd buried years ago being resurrected behind her back.

With a deep breath, she began typing.


My Dear Sister,

I've been thinking a lot about what it means to truly accept someone. Not the polite nods and correct pronouns when I'm in the room, but the deeper acknowledgment of who I am, even when I'm not present to witness it.

I overheard you speaking with Dad last week. You called me by a name that no longer exists – at least, it shouldn't. It made me realize something important: I need you to use my name consistently, not just when I'm around to hear it.

This isn't about controlling what you say. It's about whether you truly see me as who I am or merely accommodate me when I'm present. True acceptance doesn't change depending on the audience.

I understand Dad struggles, but your choice to use my deadname with him suggests your acceptance has conditions too. I need to know if that's the case.

With love and hope, Jodi


Megan's response came faster than she expected, buzzing her phone while she was still at work.


Dear Jodi,

I'm sorry you overheard that conversation. I do accept you, completely and without reservation. But I've made a conscious choice not to have arguments with Dad about this. You know how he is. When I speak with him privately, I sometimes use your deadname to avoid conflict. I don't do it to hurt you, but to maintain peace with Dad in his final years.

This isn't about my acceptance of you – it's about navigating a difficult situation with someone who refuses to change. I hope you can understand that.

Love, Megan


Jodi read the email three times, feeling a familiar ache spread through her chest. Separate yet connected, the twin pains of disappointment and validation – disappointment in her sister's response, validation that her instincts had been right all along. The acceptance was indeed conditional.

That evening, she called Megan.

“I got your email,” Jodi said after they exchanged greetings. “I need to be clear about something. When you use my deadname with Dad, you're not being neutral. You're actively invalidating who I am.”

“That's not fair,” Megan responded, her voice tightening. “I'm not trying to invalidate you. I'm trying to avoid unnecessary arguments with Dad. You know how he gets.”

“I understand wanting to avoid conflict, but this isn't just about Dad's comfort. It's about whether you truly see me as Jodi.”

“Of course I do! But I have to live in reality, and the reality is that Dad won't change. When I talk to him, I make a choice to use the name he's comfortable with to keep the peace.”

Jodi took a deep breath. “That's exactly my point. You're making a choice between his comfort and my identity, and you're choosing his comfort.”

“I'm not choosing sides,” Megan protested. “I'm trying to navigate a difficult situation without causing unnecessary pain.”

“But you are causing pain – to me. Every time you use that name, you're saying my identity is negotiable depending on who you're talking to.”

“That's not what I'm doing,” Megan said, her voice rising slightly. “I accept you completely. But I can't control Dad, and I don't want every conversation with him to turn into a battle.”

“I'm not asking you to control him or battle with him. I'm asking about your choices when you speak to him. There are ways to refer to me without using either name if necessary.”

Megan sighed. “Look, I feel like you're trying to dictate what I can say in private conversations. That seems controlling to me.”

The word hung between them like a physical barrier. Controlling. Jodi felt her throat tighten.

“This isn't about control,” she said carefully. “It's about respect. Would you use a racial slur about someone when talking to a racist, just to keep the peace?”

“That's completely different,” Megan responded immediately. “Using your old name isn't a slur. It's just what Dad knows you as.”

“It's not different to me,” Jodi said. “That name represents a person who never really existed. Using it denies who I actually am.”

“I think you're being unfair,” Megan said. “I've supported you in every way I can. I use your name and pronouns with everyone else. I've defended you to Dad countless times. But I can't fight that battle every single time I speak to him.”

“You don't have to fight. You could simply say 'my sister' without using any name.”

“And have him correct me every time? That would just make things more tense.”

Jodi felt the familiar weight of compromise settling on her shoulders. Always her. Always the one expected to bend, to understand, to accept less than full recognition.

“So your comfort with Dad is more important than consistently acknowledging who I am?”

“That's not what I said,” Megan replied, frustration evident in her voice. “You're twisting my words. I'm trying to be practical about a difficult situation.”

“Being practical shouldn't require denying who I am.”

“I'm not denying who you are! I'm just... adapting to the circumstances.”

“Those adaptations have consequences, Megan. They tell me that your acceptance is conditional.”

“This is ridiculous,” Megan said. “I've done everything to support you. I'm not going to let you make me feel guilty about how I handle conversations with Dad.”

Jodi closed her eyes. “I'm not trying to make you feel guilty. I'm trying to help you understand why this hurts me.”

“I understand you're hurt, but I think you're being unreasonable. What I say in private conversations is my business.”

“Even when what you say invalidates who I am?”

“I'm not invalidating you by occasionally using your old name with Dad to avoid an argument!”

The conversation continued in circles, with Megan repeatedly defending her right to “handle Dad in my own way” and Jodi trying to explain why using her deadname was fundamentally an act of erasure, regardless of the intention behind it.

Finally, Megan said, “I think we need to agree to disagree on this. I love you and accept you, but I don't think you can dictate what name I use when talking to Dad privately.”

“This isn't about dictating,” Jodi said, feeling exhaustion settle into her bones. “It's about whether you truly see me as who I am in all contexts, not just when it's convenient.”

“Of course I see you for who you are. But I also see Dad for who he is, and I'm trying to minimize hurt all around.”

“Except my hurt doesn't seem to factor into your calculation.”

“That's not fair,” Megan said. “Look, I think we should drop this. We're just going in circles.”

“We're going in circles because you're not acknowledging the real issue. When you use my deadname with Dad, you're participating in my erasure. That's not acceptance.”

“I disagree. I accept you completely. What I say to Dad doesn't change that.”

“It absolutely does,” Jodi insisted. “If you accepted me completely, you wouldn't toggle between names depending on who you're talking to.”

“I think this conversation isn't productive anymore,” Megan said. “I understand you're upset, but I don't agree that I'm doing anything wrong.”

“So we're at an impasse,” Jodi said quietly.

“I guess we are.”

After they hung up, Jodi sat in the gathering darkness of her apartment. The mask her sister wore – the mask of acceptance – had slipped, revealing the conditional nature of that acceptance. It wasn't about control or dictates. It was about whether Megan truly believed Jodi was who she said she was, or whether she saw Jodi's identity as something optional, to be acknowledged or discarded depending on convenience.


Three days later, Jodi received another email from Megan.


Jodi,

I've been thinking about our conversation. I want to clarify something – I do truly accept you. But I feel like you're asking me to choose between hurting you or hurting Dad, and that's not fair. I'm trying my best to navigate a complicated situation.

You say I'm not accepting you if I ever use your deadname, but I don't think that's true. I can fully accept you while still choosing to avoid conflict with Dad in private conversations.

I hope we can agree to disagree on this and move forward. I don't want this to damage our relationship.

Love, Megan


Jodi read the email twice before setting her phone down. Megan still didn't understand – or perhaps didn't want to understand. The “agree to disagree” approach framed the issue as a simple difference of opinion rather than a fundamental matter of respect and recognition.

She drafted her response carefully.


Megan,

I appreciate you reaching out, but I think there's still a disconnect in how we're seeing this situation.

This isn't about choosing between hurting me or Dad. It's about whether you truly see me as Jodi in all contexts, or whether my identity becomes optional when it's inconvenient.

When you use my deadname with Dad, you're not being neutral. You're actively participating in denying who I am. There are ways to refer to me without using either name if necessary – “my sister” works perfectly well.

The issue isn't that you're trying to avoid conflict with Dad. The issue is that you're willing to compromise my identity to do so. That suggests you see my identity as less real, less fixed than his comfort.

This isn't something we can “agree to disagree” on because it's not a matter of opinion. It's about whether you truly accept who I am or merely accommodate me when it's convenient.

I love you, but I need you to understand why this matters so deeply to me.

Jodi


Megan's reply came the next day.


Jodi,

I'm trying to understand, but I feel like you're being unreasonable. What I say in private conversations with Dad is my business. You're trying to control my speech in situations that don't even involve you directly.

I've supported you in countless ways. I use your name and pronouns with everyone else. I've defended you when others haven't. But apparently none of that matters if I occasionally use your old name with Dad to avoid an argument.

This feels like you're giving me an ultimatum – either I never use your deadname in any context, even private ones with Dad, or I don't truly accept you. That's not fair.

I'm sorry you're hurt, but I don't think I'm doing anything wrong by adapting how I refer to you when speaking privately with Dad.

Megan


The words stung, but they also clarified something for Jodi. The issue wasn't simply about a name. It was about whether Megan saw Jodi's identity as fundamentally real – as real as her own, as real as their father's discomfort.

That evening, Jodi called Megan again.

“I got your email,” she said when Megan answered.

“And?” Megan's voice was guarded.

“I think we need to be clear about what's happening here,” Jodi said. “This isn't about controlling your speech. It's about whether you truly see me as who I am.”

“Of course I see you as who you are,” Megan said, her frustration evident. “I've supported you from day one.”

“But support that changes depending on who you're talking to isn't real support. It's performance.”

“That's not fair. You're ignoring everything I've done to support you because of this one issue.”

“I appreciate everything you've done,” Jodi said carefully. “But this 'one issue' reveals something important about how you see me.”

“No, it doesn't. It reveals something about how I handle difficult conversations with Dad. That's all.”

“The fact that you're willing to use my deadname with him tells me you don't fully see it as a deadname. You see it as an alternate name I might still have some connection to.”

“That's not true,” Megan protested. “I know you're Jodi. I just use the other name with Dad because it's easier.”

“Easier for whom? Not for me. Not for my existence.”

“You're not even part of those conversations!”

“But I am, Megan. You're talking about me. You're referring to me. Just because I'm not physically present doesn't mean I'm not involved.”

Megan sighed. “Look, I feel like you're trying to control me. I don't tell you what words you can and cannot use when you talk to people privately.”

“This isn't about control. It's about respect. Using my deadname denies who I am, whether I hear it or not.”

“I disagree. I think you're being unreasonable and controlling.”

The word hung between them again. Controlling. As if Jodi's request for basic respect was an attempt to dominate her sister.

“Let me ask you something,” Jodi said. “If Dad were an anti-Semite and objected to your husband being Jewish, would you refer to Mark with slurs when talking to Dad alone, just to keep the peace?”

“That's completely different,” Megan said immediately. “Using your old name isn't a slur.”

“It is to me,” Jodi said quietly. “It denies who I am just as fundamentally.”

“I think you're being dramatic. It's just a name.”

“It's not just a name. It's a denial of my existence.”

“Oh, please,” Megan said, her voice hardening. “Using your old name with Dad doesn't deny your existence. You're still here, aren't you?”

The callousness of the response took Jodi's breath away.

“Wow,” she finally managed. “I don't think you understand at all.”

“I understand that you're asking me to choose between hurting you or hurting Dad, and then making me the bad guy when I try to find a middle ground.”

“There is no middle ground on whether I exist as Jodi or not.”

“This conversation isn't productive,” Megan said. “You've made up your mind that I don't accept you because of this one thing, and nothing I say will change that.”

“That's not true,” Jodi said. “I'm trying to help you understand why this matters so much.”

“And I'm trying to help you understand that what I say in private conversations with Dad is my business. I'm not going to let you dictate that.”

“So we're still at an impasse.”

“I guess we are,” Megan said. “Look, I love you, but I think we need to drop this. I accept you. I use your name and pronouns with everyone else. If that's not enough for you, I don't know what to say.”

After they hung up, Jodi sat in silence, feeling the weight of realization settle on her shoulders. The acceptance she'd thought was unconditional had limits after all. The mask her sister wore – the carefully constructed facade of complete acceptance – had slipped, revealing the conditional nature beneath.

It wasn't about control or ultimatums. It was simpler and more profound than that. It was about whether Megan truly believed Jodi was who she said she was, whether her identity was as solid and real as anyone else's, or whether it was something optional, to be acknowledged or discarded depending on convenience.

The answer, painful as it was, seemed clear.


Weeks passed without communication between them. Jodi threw herself into work, into friends who saw her completely, without reservation or condition. She thought often of Megan, of the gulf that had opened between them – a gulf created not by Jodi's request for respect, but by Megan's unwillingness to extend that respect consistently.

Then their father had a health scare – nothing serious in the end, but enough to prompt Megan to reach out again.


Jodi,

Dad's okay, but this made me think about our situation. Life is too short for this distance between us. I love you and accept you, even if we disagree about some things. Can we please move past this?

Love, Megan


Jodi read the email several times, feeling the familiar mix of love and frustration. Megan still didn't understand – or didn't want to understand – that this wasn't a simple disagreement they could agree to differ on. It was about whether Megan truly saw Jodi as who she was.

Her response was brief.


Megan,

I'm glad Dad is okay. I love you too, but I don't think we can just “move past this” without addressing the core issue. This isn't about disagreement. It's about respect and recognition.

When you use my deadname with Dad, you're making a choice that invalidates who I am. That's not acceptance, no matter how many times you say it is.

I'm not asking you to control Dad or fight with him. I'm asking about your choices when you speak to him. You could refer to me as “my sister” without using any name at all.

This matters deeply to me because it reveals whether you truly see me as who I am in all contexts, or whether my identity becomes optional when it's inconvenient.

Jodi


Megan's reply was almost immediate, and Jodi could feel the frustration radiating from every word.


Jodi,

I've tried to understand your perspective, but I feel like nothing I do is good enough. I've supported you in countless ways, but apparently none of that matters because of this one issue.

I don't agree that using your old name with Dad invalidates who you are. That's your interpretation, not objective fact. I see you as Jodi. I accept you as Jodi. What I say in private conversations with Dad doesn't change that.

I feel like you're trying to use me to force Dad to accept you, and that's not fair. I can't control his beliefs or behavior.

I think this conversation has reached its end. I love you, but I'm not going to let you make me feel guilty about how I handle private conversations with Dad.

Megan


The email felt like a door closing. Megan had made her choice – Dad's comfort over Jodi's identity. The mask of acceptance had not just slipped; it had fallen away entirely, revealing the conditional nature of that acceptance.

It wasn't about using Megan to force Dad to accept her. It was about whether Megan herself truly accepted her, whether that acceptance was real and consistent or merely a performance that changed depending on audience.

Jodi drafted one final email.


Megan,

I understand now. Your acceptance has conditions and limitations. It exists when convenient and disappears when difficult. That's not acceptance at all – it's tolerance at best, and even that has its limits.

This was never about using you to force Dad to accept me. It was about whether you truly see me as who I am in all contexts, not just when I'm present or when it's easy.

You've made your choice clear. Dad's comfort matters more to you than consistently acknowledging my identity. That's your right, but please don't call it unconditional acceptance or support.

I need space to process this revelation. Please respect that boundary.

Jodi


Months passed. Jodi built her life around people who saw her completely, without reservation or condition. The absence of Megan was a dull ache that never quite disappeared, but it was preferable to the sharp pain of conditional acceptance, of knowing her sister's recognition of her identity was something that could be turned on and off like a switch depending on convenience.

Then came the call. Their father had died peacefully in his sleep.

The funeral was a blur of faces, some familiar, some not. Jodi stood at the back of the church, separate from the family gathering at the front. She had come to honor her father in her own way, not to pretend at family unity that didn't exist.

After the service, Megan approached her, eyes red from crying.

“Thank you for coming,” she said, her voice thick with emotion. “Dad would have appreciated it.”

Jodi nodded but said nothing.

“Can we talk?” Megan asked. “Please? Life's too short for this distance between us.”

“What would we talk about?” Jodi asked quietly. “Has anything changed?”

“Everything's changed,” Megan said. “Dad's gone. There's no reason for us to be at odds anymore.”

And there it was – the admission Jodi had both expected and dreaded. With Dad gone, Megan saw no barrier to accepting Jodi fully. The condition that had limited her acceptance had been removed.

“So now you'll use my name consistently?” Jodi asked. “Now that it's convenient?”

“It's not about convenience,” Megan protested. “It's about... circumstances changing.”

“The circumstances haven't changed, Megan. I'm still the same person I was before Dad died. The only thing that's changed is that now it's easy for you to acknowledge that.”

“That's not fair. I always accepted you.”

“No,” Jodi said quietly. “You accepted parts of me, when it was convenient and didn't require any discomfort on your part. That's not acceptance. It's tolerance with conditions.”

“So what now?” Megan asked, a hint of frustration breaking through her grief. “We just stay estranged forever because of this?”

Jodi looked at her sister – really looked at her. She saw the grief, the confusion, the genuine desire for reconciliation. But she also saw the fundamental misunderstanding that still existed between them. Megan still didn't understand – or didn't want to understand – that her conditional acceptance had revealed something important about how she saw Jodi's identity.

“I don't know what happens now,” Jodi said honestly. “But I do know that acceptance that only appears when it's convenient isn't acceptance at all. It's performance.”

“That's not fair,” Megan repeated, but the words sounded hollow even to her own ears.

“Maybe not,” Jodi conceded. “But it's true.”

She turned and walked away, leaving Megan standing alone in the emptying church. The mask of acceptance had fallen away entirely, revealing the truth beneath. It wasn't about control or ultimatums or using Megan to get to Dad. It was simpler and more profound than that.

It was about whether Megan truly believed Jodi was who she said she was – whether her identity was as solid and real as anyone else's, or whether it was something optional, to be acknowledged or discarded depending on convenience.

The answer, painful as it was, had been made clear.

As Jodi walked to her car, she felt a strange mixture of grief and liberation. Grief for the relationship that could have been, liberation from the pretense of an acceptance that had always been conditional.

The mask had slipped, then fallen, then shattered. What remained was truth – painful, but clearer than it had ever been before.

 
Read more...

from People with Inconvenient Truths about Transphobes

This original letter1 is short and does a terrible job to make its point. Like a blunt object, it surrendered authenticity and honesty, legitimacy and poignancy, for the sake of ensuring even their lowest common denominator could not miss the impact it was intending to make. So, I couldn’t help it, I wrote two responses. Each one different, but making the same points. Satirical and direct honesty. They are both blunt methods, but even they can be wielded with finesse, originality, and charm. Well, at least I am sure somebody can :)


Dearest Holiday Letter Writer,

Thank you for sharing your holiday letter. I couldn't help but notice how you struggled with pronouns and names throughout – starting and stopping, like a car engine failing to turn over in winter. Let me help you with a small edit:

Virginia and Robert are... Virginia and Robert are... Virginia and her brother Robert live in different cities – he with his wife Evangeline in Salt Lake City, she in Savannah. Virginia graduated this month (probably – you'd know for certain if you maintained contact). You see, when parents struggle with acceptance, children sometimes struggle with staying in touch.

It's interesting how your letter reveals more in its ellipses than its words. Those dots speak volumes about the relationship you've chosen to have with your daughter. You mention that you're “fine” – but are you? Because this letter reads less like a holiday greeting and more like a cry for help.

You know what would make a lovely Christmas gift? Acceptance. It's free, requires no shipping, and never goes out of style. Virginia isn't “struggling with depression” because of who she is – research shows that family acceptance is one of the strongest predictors of mental health outcomes for trans individuals.

Perhaps next year's letter could read differently. It could be filled with joy about having two wonderful children – a son and a daughter – both living their authentic lives. Wouldn't that be something worth writing about?

With hope for better holidays ahead,

People with Inconvenient Truths about Transphobes [PITT]

P.S. Virginia's pronouns are she/her. I thought you might want to make a note of that for next year's letter.


Dearest Holiday Letter Writer,

Let me translate your ellipses-riddled masterpiece of passive-aggressive seasonal greetings:

“Dear Everyone I'm Desperately Trying to Impress While Publicly Grieving a Child Who Isn't Dead,

I've been hiding for two years because I can't handle my daughter's existence disrupting my carefully curated Christmas card narrative. I love looking at your 'normal' family photos though – they feed my denial beautifully!

Let me demonstrate my commitment to emotional self-sabotage by stumbling through this paragraph like a drunk reindeer: Robert (my GOOD child) lives in Salt Lake City with his wife (see how NORMAL that is?). As for my other child – dramatic pause – theatrical sigh – dabs eyes with tinsel – well, I'll deadname them repeatedly while pretending I don't know basic facts about their life because that's easier than admitting I'm choosing ignorance over love.

I'll throw in some vague references to depression because it's easier to blame mental health than acknowledge that my rejection might be the problem. But don't worry about me – I'm 'fine' (narrator: she was not fine).

Sending thoughts and prayers (but not acceptance),

A Parent Who Chose Pride Over Love”

Hope This Helps,

PITT


1 https://www.pittparents.com/p/holiday-letter

 
Read more...

from People with Inconvenient Truths about Transphobes

This is in response to the anti-trans echo chamber pittparents.com article1

Dear Friend,

Your lunch yesterday sounds exhausting – for everyone involved. I couldn't help but notice how you tiptoed around dropping your “biological reality” bombs like they were casual conversation starters. That must have been quite the performance – sort of like announcing you don't believe in gravity while passing the salt, then claiming it is just an ideology.

I find it fascinating how you claim to “care about and feel compassion” while systematically denying someone's existence over breadsticks. That's quite the party trick. It's rather like saying “I care about you deeply” while repeatedly stepping on someone's foot and insisting their pain isn't real.

You know what's actually instinctual? Compassion. Empathy. The ability to listen when someone tells you who they are. What's not instinctual is writing lengthy letters justifying why you think it's okay to make spaces unsafe for your friends' daughter.

Your argument about bathroom segregation being “instinctual” across “far-flung societies” is particularly interesting, considering public bathrooms as we know them only became common in the late 19th century2. Sex segregated bathrooms came about as a means to, get this, integrate women into the social public sector as we women were so graciously allowed out of the home and into the workforce that staffed new factories being built. That’s right, it was to keep women segregated yet integrated. Sound familiar?3 The Victorian era called – they'd like their moral panic back.

You mention “traditions in this country” – interesting choice of words. You know what else was tradition? Bloodletting, believing women couldn't vote, and thinking left-handed people were possessed by demons. Tradition isn't a moral compass; it's often just peer pressure from dead people. You say that “we don't … have a tradition of coercing people to act according to beliefs they don't share,” yet that is precisely what you are doing. You don’t want to believe science and facts, and you demand that others live according to your definitions and your rules. You believe that laws must be passed to deny people their right to equality, care, and even their own identity.

But equality is not pie, equal rights for trans folks does not mean less equal rights for others.

The real “biological reality” here is that gender identity is supported by decades of medical research and professional consensus. Trans people have existed throughout human history, across cultures and continents. But I suppose that's less convenient than your bathroom theories and “every cell in the body” argument, which, by the way, would fail a modern biology exam.

I agree that we need to protect women's rights and spaces. That's exactly why we need to protect ALL women, including your friend's daughter. Trans women are women, and excluding them doesn't make spaces safer, it puts gender non-conforming cis women and girls under increased scrutiny, and increases the risk of harassment and assault to trans people.4 It just makes things crueler. Trans people are not responsible for your feelings of fear, prejudice, or anxiety.

You're right about one thing: this isn't about “beliefs.” This is about respect, dignity, and the basic human decency to acknowledge someone's identity. Your friends aren't asking you to change your chromosomes – they're asking you to show their daughter the basic respect all humans deserve. To be treated and accepted for who they are, not what you want them to be.

Maybe before your next lunch date, consider that true friendship isn't about tolerating people despite who they are – it's about accepting them because of who and what they are today, and not for what they had to overcome and survive to get to today. People with minds, hearts, hopes and dreams, and feelings too. You know, human beings. Just like you.

Then maybe you will value your friends and fellow human beings just as much as you value your sensibilities and entitlement.

With all due respect (and the appropriate amount of side-eye), A Friend Who Actually Understands What Friendship Means 1

CW: Transmisia couched in a “dear friend” letter. N.D.,. (20241211) “To My Dear Friends: No, I don’t believe your son is now your daughter. No, that isn’t bigotry” pittparents.com (Substack) https://www.pittparents.com/p/to-my-dear-friends-no-i-dont-believe 2

Wright, L. (2960). Clean and Decent: The Fascinating History of the Bathroom. Routledge & Kegan Paul. 3

Rhodan, M. (2016) “Why Do We Have Men’s and Women’s Bathrooms Anyway?”.(2016) Time. https://time.com/4337761/history-sex-segregated-bathrooms/ 4

Herman, J. L. (2013). Gendered Restrooms and Minority Stress. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 19(1). https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Restrooms-Minority-Stress-Jun-2013.pdf

 
Read more...

from People with Inconvenient Truths about Transphobes

The “Transphobe Exception”

“Voltaire got it right long ago: ‘Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.’ ” – Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion.

My Mom After I Came Out Starter Pack

Hey parents – are you troubled by your child's identity and stubborn in your refusal to understand? Are you desperate for an immediate solution to your discomfort and frustrated by experts telling you to love and accept your child?

Well, we've got the solution for you: The Transphobe Exception!

The Transphobe Exception: When you want to do something that's contrary to common decency, ethics, evidence, or common sense, you just say “I don't believe in trans” and then you get to say and do whatever you want.

Who can use it: Anyone who doesn't want to accept or support transgender people!

When can you use it: Whenever you feel like it!

This is how you use it:

To Override Ethics and Evidence in Parenting

You remind everyone that you know what's best for your child, that you can't be expected to learn about or understand transgender identities, and that you would rather risk losing your child than accept them for who they are. Because you are right, and being right overrides all else, and if they disagree with you then you are the victim!

Then you will refuse to use your child's correct name and pronouns, deny them access to gender-affirming care, and attempt to force them to conform to your expectations of their assigned gender. If anyone questions the harm you are causing or the evidence supporting affirming care, due to the Transphobe Exception, you can simply ignore the facts and accuse others of “indoctrinating” your child.

To Ignore Science and Rely on Faith and Magical Thinking

Transphobes don't have to follow these pesky “expert consensus” rules that usually apply in science and medicine. It's way more convenient to rely on outdated stereotypes, misinformation, an 8th grader’s understanding of biology, and debunked theories. We wouldn't want to challenge anyone's biases, so telling parents they should educate themselves about gender diversity might be uncomfortable for them to hear! There are only 2 genders! Transgender people don't really exist? The sky's the limit when you're ignoring evidence. You can believe what you want and teach your kids whatever you want, and you don't need to learn about the realities of transgender identities because of the Transphobe Exception.

To Disregard Sound Logic

Who needs logic and empathy when you have fear and judgment?

With the Transphobe Exception, you can say things like “you're just confused” and “it's just a phase” and you don't have to explain why you think you know your child better than they know themselves. There is no need for nuance or understanding. Trans identities are whatever you want them to be, regardless of the lived experiences of actual transgender people.

To Avoid Serious Journalism

The Transphobe Exception works for media too! You don't have to do any of that fair and balanced stuff. You just write and read only negative things about trans people and you can feel justified in your prejudice, knowing that anyone who disagrees is just a “woke leftist.” When experts, major medical organizations, and transgender people themselves try to share facts and personal experiences, that's just because they are “pushing an agenda” and they don't want to acknowledge “basic biology.” It's a real shame. When they try to get the word out about the importance of supporting transgender youth and the positive outcomes of gender-affirming care, you just ignore it and eventually it will go away. You know those experts are just “virtue signaling” anyway.

To Bypass Child Welfare and Well-Being

Transphobia is about reinforcing your own beliefs—even about your kids! —so children have no right to question or explore their identity. The parent knows best—they get the Transphobe Exception.

Parents—if your child tells you they are transgender or non-binary, you know it's because they are “confused” and have been “influenced” by social media or peers. That means it's no longer safe to allow them to explore their identity. Ignore the medical professionals and support groups that will teach you how to affirm and support your child, and how much happier and healthier transgender youth are when they are accepted by their families! Doesn't that sound too good to be true? You remember that “basic biology,” right? And no, this is not neglect or abuse, because…Transphobe Exception.

Now, once you tell your child that you won’t accept them if they transition, and won’t permit them to do so, if you tell them you won’t “affirm” them and then they run away or you find that you are now estranged from them, just go to the online forums and your local church, white supremacy group, or local GOP center, and they will help you find the perfect echo chamber to reinforce your victimhood. They will love and support you like your child or family is refusing to do. So, will your friends online.

There’s No Justification for the Transphobe Exception

No credible evidence or expert opinion justifies an exception, much less a pass of the magnitude transphobes have given themselves across the board in parenting, education, science, journalism, and politics.

There are good parents, teachers, and other allies trying to step in and provide love and support for transgender youth, and good journalists and academics trying to follow best practices to report accurately and compassionately on transgender issues, but they are being overwhelmed by the onslaught of anti-trans activists and misinformation, especially in the US —we are institutionalizing transphobia, which, through the Transphobe Exception, demands willful ignorance. This is actively harming and hurting transgender and gender non-conforming people!

  • 2021 was the deadliest year on record for transgender and gender non-conforming people in the United States, with at least 57 transgender or gender non-conforming people killed, surpassing the previous high of 44 deaths in 20201

  • The FBI reported a 41% increase in hate crimes based on gender identity bias between 2019 and 2020, with 202 incidents reported in 2020 compared to 143 in 2019.2

  • The Trans Murder Monitoring project, which collects data on reported killings of transgender and gender-diverse people worldwide, recorded 327 murders between October 2022 and September 2023.3

  • The Trevor Project's 2023 National Survey on LGBTQ Youth Mental Health found the following:

    • 41% of transgender and nonbinary youth seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year, and 14% attempted suicide.

    • LGBTQ young people who had access to affirming homes, schools, community events, and online spaces reported lower rates of attempting suicide compared to those who did not.

    • LGBTQ young people who had access to affirming homes, schools, community events, and online spaces reported lower rates of attempting suicide compared to those who did not.

    • Affirming gender identity among transgender and nonbinary young people is consistently associated with lower rates of attempting suicide 4

  • A 2018 study by the American Academy of Pediatrics found that 50.8% of transgender male adolescents, 41.8% of nonbinary adolescents, and 29.9% of transgender female adolescents had attempted suicide at least once in their lifetime.5

Enough is enough. The Transphobe Exception must end.

1 https://www.hrc.org/resources/fatal-violence-against-the-transgender-and-gender-non-conforming-community-in-2021

2 https://www.justice.gov/crs/highlights/2020-hate-crimes-statistics

3 https://transrespect.org/en/trans-murder-monitoring-2023/

4 https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2023/#intro

5 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-4218

 
Read more...

from The Chronicles

a short story

The laughter and chatter of her family filled Jodie with warmth as she pulled up to their house for Sunday dinner. It had been months since she was able to make the long drive out to her childhood home. As hard as it was to save up for her gender affirming surgery, family was still family. Jodie smiled as her sister Sarah opened the door, pulling her into an excited hug. 

“You’re finally here! We all missed you so much, sis!” Sarah said. 

Behind her, Jodie could see her parents setting the table, and her eldest sister, Jane, finishing up in the kitchen. Seeing all their faces, smelling the familiar scents of dinner at home, and hearing the playful banter tossed back and forth ignited a deep warmth of nostalgia from within. Jodie smiled with her whole face.

Dinner passed cheerfully, her family asking about her new apartment and job. Jodie relaxed, soaking up the love she’d yearned for. This is why she stayed connected, this is what she worked so hard for, despite everything that was said and done over all these years.

As Sarah helped wash dishes, Jodie overheard chatter from the dining room where her eldest sister and parents lingered.

“It was nice having the whole family together again. Mark looked so happy, don’t you think Dad?” asked Jane

“He does, I am so glad that things seem to be working out for Mark in his job” said Dad

Jodie froze. Mark. Her dead name, from years and years of denial of her true self. Sarah and Jane never slipped up like that. But here, out of Jodie’s presence, her family’s conversation exposed the truth, lurking silently beneath the surface. Uncertain, and not wanting to assume the worst, Jodie turns to face Sarah and asks

“Is this how it is when I am not around?”

Sarah gave a little wince and replied

“Well, you know Dad says it hurts too much to use your chosen name, so we all use your old name when you aren’t around because we don’t want to hurt him.”

Jodie’s eyes watered, as her heart fractured anew. No matter how warmly they treated her to her face, no matter how much they professed their love, acceptance, and support, as soon as she left the room, she was suddenly Mark again. Her identity, her person-hood, erased.

She wanted to march in there and confront them, demand they show her the basic respect they show anyone else, to call her by her name — Jodie. That respect for a loved one should not be a matter of convenience or optional based on other’s sensibilities. But she knew from experience how quickly that turned into accusations of overreacting or trying to control speech. Her efforts to find compromises and to help them understand just how much this hurts just falls on deaf, defensive ears.

Instead, she made an excuse about traffic and slipped out the door early, with stinging eyes and a breaking heart, old wounds weeping again. She did not have the emotional stamina to engage in the labor required to broach this topic yet again. Driving home, Jodie replayed all the happy conversations, jokes, and warmth from the evening. Even her parents smiling faces and her sisters warm greetings now carried a shadow- one that whispered “Mark” when she wasn’t close enough to stop them. When she was not close enough to matter. 

She wiped her eyes at a stop light. She would not keep returning, hoping that this time would be different, that this time they would finally accept her completely. Her identity was not an occasional costume, it was not invalid or illegitimate in some way — but her deepest truth, the core of who she is. As painful as it was, she accepted that their love had sharp, cutting edges if even out of her presence, they denied who she is. Jodie touched her heart promising that one day, she would find a family who accepted and respected her for who and what she is, and called her nothing but that: Jodie, daughter and sister.

 
Read more...